Going beyond the single item: deriving and evaluating a composite subjective wellbeing measure in the Swiss Household Panel
Action | Key |
---|---|
Play / Pause | K or space |
Mute / Unmute | M |
Toggle fullscreen mode | F |
Select next subtitles | C |
Select next audio track | A |
Toggle automatic slides maximization | V |
Seek 5s backward | left arrow |
Seek 5s forward | right arrow |
Seek 10s backward | shift + left arrow or J |
Seek 10s forward | shift + right arrow or L |
Seek 60s backward | control + left arrow |
Seek 60s forward | control + right arrow |
Seek 1 frame backward | alt + left arrow |
Seek 1 frame forward | alt + right arrow |
Decrease volume | shift + down arrow |
Increase volume | shift + up arrow |
Decrease playback rate | < |
Increase playback rate | > |
Seek to end | end |
Seek to beginning | beginning |
Share this media
When subscribed to notifications, an email will be sent to you for all added annotations.
Your user account has no email address.
Information on this media
[VIDEO PUBLIQUE – Visible pour toutes et tous]
Abstract:
Researchers using the Swiss Household Panel have been inconsistent in their choice and use of wellbeing indicators, making comparability of findings across studies difficult.
In the study presented, our aim was to derive an aggregate measure that maximises the SHP’s potential to examine multiple dimensions of wellbeing and examine its validity and reliability. This will help researchers to make more informed decisions when using wellbeing measures in the SHP.
This study was theoretically guided by the seminal work of Ed Diener on subjective wellbeing. Due to the availability of the measures over time, we focused on affect (emotional measures) and life satisfaction (cognitive measures).
We assessed the factorial structure and internal reliability of the wellbeing indicators available in the SHP and tested their measurement invariance across age groups, periods, gender, questionnaire languages, and survey modes. We demonstrated that combining single items in the SHP can derive a psychometrically robust wellbeing measure.
Speaker:
Dawid Gondek, Senior researcher, FORS (the Swiss Centre of Expertise in the Social Sciences)
Dawid Gondek works on the CovidGen project that examines the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on wellbeing of young people. He completed his PhD in quantitative social science at University College London in 2020.
His interests are in population mental health and wellbeing from the life course perspective. His research focuses on better understanding generational and life course trends of mental health, their determinants and consequences.
Ce colloque fait partie d'une série de colloques sur le thème:
Measures of (Health-related) Quality of life and well-being: development, application and policy relevance
Date: 25/02/2025
Ce colloque vous est proposé par le Département épidémiologie et systèmes de santé (DESS) d'Unisanté. Retrouvez toutes les informations sur les colloques passés et futurs sur www.unisante.ch/colloques-dess.
Other media in the channel "Colloque du DESS"
Colloque DESS - « Periurbanisation and the changing geography of mortality in Switzerland since 1966 »-20250610 1130-1.mp4June 12th, 2025
7 views, 7 this year, 7 this monthSoins oncologiques vus par les patientes et patients: enseignements de SCAPEJune 5th, 2025
3 views, 3 this year, 3 this monthDoes Healthcare Deliver?May 27th, 2025
3 views, 3 this yearRéseaux bayésiens et analyse complexe des risques - applications potentielles dans le domaine de la santéMay 1st, 2025
5 views, 5 this yearNutrition durable: une perspective de santé publiqueApril 3rd, 2025
3 views, 3 this year, 2 this monthMesurer la qualité de vie des personnes âgées: développement et applications du questionnaire Older people Quality of Life-7 domains (OQoL-7)April 3rd, 2025